I am not ceremonially unclean.
Crapitalism has turned the market place into a place of worship. Once upon a time, money changers turned the place of worship into a marketplace; nowadays, the marketplace is the place of worship. And just like then, we need Jesus to fashion a cord of whips and drive out the rabble.
The temple of Mammon has held council and considered that new membership requirements are needed to continue to participate. The old agreements have been shredded and no one is being grandfathered in or exonerated for good behavior and time served (unless you are of the priestly caste, in which case, needless to say, some rules and regulations may not apply).
I am not a proselyte of your religion. You cannot excommunicate me. I am not a member of your congregation. The free market does not belong to you, but to free men freely exercising their God-given abilities. Your cancellations are not tantamount to excommunication. You have no ecclesiastical authority over me. I am not a devotee of your demonology.
All that to say, I do not need to prove that I’m safe. I am not dangerous until proven safe. I am not dirty until proven clean. I am not guilty until proven innocent. I am not a problem until proven compliant. And I am not sorry.
Additionally, I am not your lab rat.
You cannot poke or prod me without my consent. "No!," means, "No." Anything short of you keeping your hands off of me is rape. You've heard my reply. I wasn't unclear. No. You do not have the right to perform spot checks on my person. I did not sign up to be someone else's pin cushion. I never agreed to the terms and conditions. I never scrolled down and checked the box. I have to prove I'm not a robot in order to check my e-mail, but I have to prove I am a robot in order to continue employment? You cannot run tests on me intermittently for some satanic side hustle you’ve got in the works. I do not need to prove that I'm not sick and I do not need to be subjected to regular spot checks to ensure I haven't been contaminated. You cannot quarantine the healthy in order to safeguard the sick.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
No comments:
Post a Comment